10/6/2023 0 Comments Pro athletes make too much moneyIt is the preferences of consumers that drive the formation of prices all the way backwards along the production chain. However, unless consumers value “Martian skillets” more than the terrestrial variety, expending all that effort to procure otherworldly metal will not result in a higher price being paid for it. Of course, producers must not ignore physical reality in their business decisions: it will clearly require far more time and energy to manufacture skillets from iron mined on Mars than from the same metal mined on earth. What’s more, the costs producers face in their operations are not determined by nonhuman factors such as energy expenditures, chemical transformations, or the abundance or scarcity of various raw materials rather they are the consequence of the producers’ evaluation of alternative ways in which they might earn their livings by meeting consumer demand. Producers of items needed for the production of consumer goods will find it rewarding to produce those items only if consumers value the final goods enough to pay for the resources and work necessary to create them. But competition among entrepreneurs for buyers’ dollars rewards those entrepreneurs whose forecasts are generally most accurate with profits that allow them to remain in business and invest even more in the future.Ĭonsumers must bid enough to prompt producers into action, and the price of every good-industrial products as well as consumption items-can be traced to consumer choice. Those estimates can turn out to be over-optimistic: producers are often mistaken in gauging consumer demand, and many a business has gone under because it spent more to manufacture its offerings than consumers were willing to pay. Producers face costs in providing a good, and if they estimate that buyers will not pay at least enough for their output to cover their costs plus some profit, the good will not be produced. That’s because in a market economy the price paid for any factor of production (including labor services) arises from the choices consumers make about the items they wish to buy and how much they are willing to pay. It is the very fans who often grumble about the “ridiculous” wages paid to top athletes who in effect set their salaries. (Not just the four of them, of course, but them in concert with all other sports fans.) The correct answer, especially given that we were in a sports bar, is that the discussants themselves ultimately are the ones setting such high rewards for being an outstanding athlete. What no one participating in the barroom banter that afternoon seemed to consider was the question of just who is responsible for the size of Rodriguez’s salary. I am presenting an account of their conversation here not because I suspect that the readers of The Freeman are especially interested in Rodriguez, but because it struck me as representative of a type of complaint commonly made about the workings of the market: To many people it just doesn’t seem right that pop stars/investment bankers/athletes get paid so much more than nurses/firemen/teachers. The bartender defended Rodriguez’s salary, asking, “If someone offered you $25 million, would you turn them down? And besides, if the owners can pay ballplayers that much, how much are they making?” (His second defense of Rodriguez’s income level is, of course, open to the objection that the owners are even more overpaid than are players.) (Rodriguez currently makes roughly $25 million per season.) One of the customers said it was absurd that Rodriguez makes so much when, for instance, teachers, charged with educating our children make only $50,000 or $60,000 per year. I was sitting in a sports bar recently when the bartender and three of the patrons near me began discussing the salary of New York Yankee third-baseman Alex Rodriguez.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |